251
Her Majesty
Mr. Jadis
I have done
best to answer
May
Perivale's engineering:
The Office Referee who received the Papers - attack a list of them / from the Port Office states that they were delivered either with the mail which arrived on the night of the 31st of July last, and that they reached hands in the condition in which they are now, in loose bundles, and without covering or address of any kind.
In that case very serious blame would seem to attach somewhere between Hong Kong and the Post Office here. As far as Despatches to the Secretary of State are concerned it is impossible to conceive anything more scrupulously careful (as I have pointed out to Mr. Blackwood more than once) than the mode in which they are made up at Hong Kong.
In explanation of the omission to send these papers into the Registry room as is usual -
251
Her Memale
Mr. Jadis
I have dorie
best to answer
May
Perivale's enginery:
The Office Reefer who received the Papers
- attack a list of them / from the Port Office states that they were delivered either with the mail which arrived on the righ that of
the 31th of July last _t that they reached hands in the condition in which they are now, in loose bundles, and without covering or address any kind.
In that case very serious bladue
8:
ould seem to attach somecobere between Hong Kong and the Post Office here. As far as Despatches to the
Secretary of
State
Conceive anything
are concerned it is impossible to
ncore
scmpulously carefiel ( as I have
printed out to Mr. Blackwoood more than once then
the mode in which
Rong.
they
are made up at Hong
In explanation of the omission to
: Send these papers into the Registry roode as is usual-
Fale
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.